Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner Pages
Archives
Monthly Archives: October 2011
DNA Patenting “Urban Legend” Debunked At AIPLA
The most interesting presentation at the Annual AIPLA Meeting – which is not yet over – was Professor Christopher M. Holman’s talk – “Deconstructing the myth that 20% of the human genome is patented” which was based on his paper … Continue reading
Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter
Tagged AIPLA, DNA, patents, Professor Christopher M. Holman, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment
EU High Court Bans Patents on Cells Requiring Processing Human Embryos
Defining “human embryos” broadly, The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled that pluripotent stem cells derived from human embryos and totipotent stem cells derived from blastocysts are not patentable if they are obtained by destroying human embryos … Continue reading
Posted in Stem Cells/Cloning
Tagged human embryos, Patent Law, pluripotent, stem cells, Warren Woessner
1 Comment
Infringement by Unobvious Changes – A Look (Way) Back
As a much younger attorney, I gave a presentation at the 1990 AIPLA Annual Meeting: “A Review of Recent Federal Circuit Decisions Relating to Infringement” (AIPLA Selected Legal Papers, 9, 3 (July 1991)), in which I wrestled with the question … Continue reading
Obviousness = Equivalence? Saint-Gobain v. Siemens
Saint-Gobain Ceramics (“S-G”) has asked the Supreme Court to review the Fed. Cir. panel below, 647 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2011) in which the panel decision refused to reverse a district court decision that instructed the jury that it could … Continue reading