<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Biotechnology Patent Law Blog &#124; Patents4Life by Warren Woessner &#187; Assignment/Ownership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patents4life.com/category/assignmentownership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patents4life.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:44:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.patents4life.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Courts decides Stanford v. Roche – Clarifies Scope of Bayh-Dole Act</title>
		<link>http://www.patents4life.com/2011/06/supreme-courts-decides-stanford-v-roche-%e2%80%93-clarifies-scope-of-bayh-dole-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patents4life.com/2011/06/supreme-courts-decides-stanford-v-roche-%e2%80%93-clarifies-scope-of-bayh-dole-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Woessner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Assignment/Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayh-Dole Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Businessweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP law tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robin Rasor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford v Roche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Woessner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patents4life.com/?p=1195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 6, 2011, the Supreme Court rejected Stanford’s arguments that provisions of the Bayh-Dole Act created university ownership rights to inventions made by university employees with federal funding. (A copy of the decision is found at the end of this post.) In effect, the Court held that an assignment in hand is worth (more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patents4life.com/2011/06/supreme-courts-decides-stanford-v-roche-%e2%80%93-clarifies-scope-of-bayh-dole-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Owns First? Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems</title>
		<link>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/10/who-owns-first-stanford-university-v-roche-molecular-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/10/who-owns-first-stanford-university-v-roche-molecular-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Woessner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Assignment/Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ciresi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schutz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patents4life.com/2009/10/who-owns-first-stanford-university-v-roche-molecular-systems/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attached is an article written by Ron Schutz of Robins, Kaplan, Miller and Ciresi and is posted with his permission. APaTS Who Owns First.pdf]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/10/who-owns-first-stanford-university-v-roche-molecular-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

