Category Archives: Govt Policy/PTO Policy

Exhausted by Exhaustion: Impression Products v. Lexmark

Please revisit Don Chisum’s and Janice Mueller’s comments on Impression Products v. Lexmark, No. 151189 (S. Ct. May 30, 2017), in which the Court held that a seller of a patented printer cartridge had exhausted its patent rights, so that … Continue reading

Posted in Govt Policy/PTO Policy, Litigation Issues | Leave a comment

IPO, AIPLA and ABA IP Section Propose Legislative Fixes for Section 101

Between February and May of this year, IPO, AIPLA and the ABA IP Section have released proposals for amendments to 35 U.S.C. s. 101 to void the Mayo/Alice Rule and to clarify the definition of an “abstract idea” as it relates … Continue reading

Posted in Govt Policy/PTO Policy, Patent Reform Legislation, Section 101 | 6 Comments

Manhattan March for Science

This following is a recap of the Manhattan March for Science by Robin Chadwick. The March for Science in Manhattan was smaller than the January 2017 Women’s March in Washington, but large enough that the “entry point” for us was changed from 62nd … Continue reading

Posted in Govt Policy/PTO Policy | 1 Comment

Patent Office Releases Comments on Standards for Patent Eligibility Examination

On November 2nd, Robert Bahr released a concise but informative memorandum that could be entitled “What We Learned From McRO and BASCOM.” I have posted on McRO, Inc. dba Planet Blue v. Bandi Namco Games America Inc. et al., 120 … Continue reading

Posted in Claim Construction, Federal Court, Govt Policy/PTO Policy, Uncategorized, USPTO Practice and Policy | Leave a comment