Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner Pages
Archives
Category Archives: Litigation Issues
UCB v. Yeda R&D Co. – No “Safe Harbor” for Unamended Claims
UCB sued Yeda for a DJ of non-infringement of US Patent No. 6,090,923 [Appeal No. 2015-1957 (Fed. Cir. September 8, 2016)].The main claim in question was directed to “A monoclonal antibody which specifically binds a human cytotoxin [having X properties].” … Continue reading
Duties And Responsibilities Of A Corporate Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(B)(6) Witness
The following is from the Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi newsletter BuLITS and written by Ron Schutz Case: In re Neurontin Antitrust Litigation, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62032, MDL No. 1479, Master File No. 02-1390 (D.N.J. 6/9/2011). Facts: Direct purchasers … Continue reading
Posted in Litigation Issues
Tagged Federal Circuit, intellectual property, ip, RKM&C, Schutz, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment
Where Will the Burden Fall – Microsoft v. i4i Argued Before the Supreme Court
Find below a recent article from Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. regarding Advanced Patent Trial Strategies (APaTS). i4i APaTS Special
Judge Goes Medieval On Spoilating Defendants
This summary of Victor Stanley v. Creative Pipe et al., provided by Ron Schutz of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi is a cautionary tale for patent prosecutors served with subpoenas (or about to be). If the appropriate steps are not … Continue reading