<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Biotechnology Patent Law Blog &#124; Patents4Life by Warren Woessner &#187; Organization/Business News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patents4life.com/category/organizationbusiness-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patents4life.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:44:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.patents4life.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Savior or Candidate for &#8220;Worst Patentee&#8221;? Nutriset</title>
		<link>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/09/savior-or-candidate-for-worst-patentee-nutriset/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/09/savior-or-candidate-for-worst-patentee-nutriset/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Woessner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organization/Business News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutriset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plumpy nut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Woessner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patents4life.com/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Sunday&#8217;s New York Times magazine had a provocative article about Plumpy&#8217;nut, a nutritive peanut paste that is foil-packaged so it does not need refrigeration. When eaten by malnourished children it can &#8220;cure&#8221; them in a relatively brief period of time. It is being touted as nearly a miracle food for countries in Africa or Central America, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/09/savior-or-candidate-for-worst-patentee-nutriset/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is The “Golden Rule” Of Biological Drugs At Hand?</title>
		<link>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/04/is-the-%e2%80%9cgolden-rule%e2%80%9d-of-biological-drugs-at-hand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/04/is-the-%e2%80%9cgolden-rule%e2%80%9d-of-biological-drugs-at-hand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Woessner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organization/Business News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Woessner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patents4life.com/?p=268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just finished speaking on IP issues involving biomarkers at a Q1 Conference in the Bay Area. Before the conference started, I spoke to the head patent counsel of a well-known bio/pharma company. He said, to my initial shock, that he thought new drugs based on small molecules were on the way out as commercial [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/04/is-the-%e2%80%9cgolden-rule%e2%80%9d-of-biological-drugs-at-hand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH v. HEDRICK &#8211; ON A (CLEAR) CONCEPTION DAY</title>
		<link>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/07/university-of-pittsburgh-v-hedrick-on-a-clear-conception-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/07/university-of-pittsburgh-v-hedrick-on-a-clear-conception-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Woessner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organization/Business News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court of appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hendrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stem cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Woessner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patents4life.com/2009/07/university-of-pittsburgh-v-hedrick-on-a-clear-conception-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From a prosecutor&#8217;s standpoint, the &#8217;231 patent (link at bottom of this post) has &#8220;dream claims&#8221; to a new class of stem cells. Claim 1 reads: An isolated adipose-derived stem cell that can differentiate into two or more of the group consisting of a bone cell, a cartilage cell, a nerve cell, or a muscle [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/07/university-of-pittsburgh-v-hedrick-on-a-clear-conception-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BIOTECH INDUSTRY IN MINNESOTA &#8211; STAYIN&#039; ALIVE</title>
		<link>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/07/biotech-industry-in-minnesota-stayin-alive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/07/biotech-industry-in-minnesota-stayin-alive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Woessner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organization/Business News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotech industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Woessner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patents4life.com/2009/07/biotech-industry-in-minnesota-stayin-alive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In its July 3rd issue, the Minneapolis St. Paul Business Journal published a list of the &#8220;Top 25 Biotech Companies.&#8221; It tells a pretty sad story. The top 25 companies together employ fewer than 3000 workers in Minnesota. The top four employ 85% of them, and two of them, Beckman Coulter Inc. and Syngenta Seeds, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/07/biotech-industry-in-minnesota-stayin-alive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

