Category Archives: Prosecution History Estopped

Federal Circuit Reverses District Court's Finding that Generic Eloxatins do not Infringe Sanofi's Patent

In my June 22, 2009 post, I discussed the district court decision that found a claim to optically-pure oxaliplatin (U.S. Pat. No 5,338,874) not infringed by defendants who made it by processes other than the HPLC process disclosed in the … Continue reading

Posted in Prosecution History Estopped | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

COURT “CUSSES OUT” SANOFI – HOLDS OXALIPLATIN PATENT NOT INFRINGED

For some years, Tom Irving of Finnegan Farabow, et al. has been giving a very amusing, but increasingly serious, talk about the dangers of what he calls “Patent Profanity.” The version I heard in May was, “Patently Profane at You … Continue reading

Posted in Prosecution History Estopped | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment