<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Biotechnology Patent Law Blog &#124; Patents4Life by Warren Woessner &#187; Tech Transfer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patents4life.com/category/tech-transfer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patents4life.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:44:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.patents4life.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Bayh-Dole Act Turns Thirty – Dec. 1st Fete Planned</title>
		<link>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/11/bayh-dole-act-turns-thirty-%e2%80%93-dec-1st-fete-planned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/11/bayh-dole-act-turns-thirty-%e2%80%93-dec-1st-fete-planned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Woessner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayh-Dole Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Woessner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patents4life.com/?p=657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With major litigation looming over invention ownership rights affected by the Bayh Dole Act (see my post of November 3rd on Stanford v. Roche), the link below is to a site created by AUTM and a number of other organizations concerned with university tech transfer. The site provides some good background on the history and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/11/bayh-dole-act-turns-thirty-%e2%80%93-dec-1st-fete-planned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court To Address Scope Of Bayh-Dole Act</title>
		<link>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/11/supreme-court-to-address-scope-of-bayh-dole-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/11/supreme-court-to-address-scope-of-bayh-dole-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Woessner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayh-Dole Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP law tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford v Roche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Woessner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patents4life.com/?p=632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Monday, November 1st, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Stanford v. Roche, 583 F.3d 832 (Fed. Cir. 2009), in which the Fed. Cir. decided that a professor could void his University-employer’s rights under the Bayh-Dole act to elect title to an invention he made with government grant support, by assigning his rights in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/11/supreme-court-to-address-scope-of-bayh-dole-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>University IP In The News – Expedited Examination And March-In Request</title>
		<link>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/08/university-ip-in-the-news-%e2%80%93-expedited-examination-and-march-in-request/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/08/university-ip-in-the-news-%e2%80%93-expedited-examination-and-march-in-request/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Woessner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fabrazyme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fabry Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Wolf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H.R. 5980]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WARF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Woessner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patents4life.com/?p=459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On July 29th, Rep. Frank Wolf (D.-Va.) introduced H.R. 5980 that would give priority to examination of patent applications filed by U.S. universities and by their “patent holding companies.” The definition of the latter seems a bit vague, but is apparently intended to cover entities like the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) that finances prep/pros [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/08/university-ip-in-the-news-%e2%80%93-expedited-examination-and-march-in-request/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BACK TO THE O.K. CORRAL &#8211; SHOULD PROFESSORS MANAGE IP LICENSING?</title>
		<link>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/01/back-to-the-o-k-corral-should-professors-manage-ip-licensing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/01/back-to-the-o-k-corral-should-professors-manage-ip-licensing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Woessner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayh-Dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard Business Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kauffman Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology transfer office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TTO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Woessner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patents4life.com/2010/01/back-to-the-o-k-corral-should-professors-manage-ip-licensing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last summer, Bob Litan and Lesa Mitchell of the Kauffman Foundation sent a short memo to Esther Lee at the Dept. of Commerce entitled &#8220;Accelerating the Commercialization of Government-Funded University-Based Research.&#8221; Although the Foundation, based in Kansas City MO, has been interested in university tech transfer at least since 2003 when it issued a report [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/01/back-to-the-o-k-corral-should-professors-manage-ip-licensing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WARF and Life Sciences in Wisconsin &#8211; A Memoir</title>
		<link>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/09/warf-and-life-sciences-in-wisconsin-a-memoir/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/09/warf-and-life-sciences-in-wisconsin-a-memoir/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Woessner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WARF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Woessner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patents4life.com/2009/09/warf-and-life-sciences-in-wisconsin-a-memoir/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday and today, the Minneapolis StarTribune has run lengthy stories contrasting the development of the biotechnology industry in Wisconsin with that in Minnesota. Today&#8217;s story focuses on the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) and its successful efforts to found and promote life science start-ups based on technology developed at the University of Wisconsin. While today&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/09/warf-and-life-sciences-in-wisconsin-a-memoir/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH v. HEDRICK &#8211; ON A (CLEAR) CONCEPTION DAY</title>
		<link>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/07/university-of-pittsburgh-v-hedrick-on-a-clear-conception-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/07/university-of-pittsburgh-v-hedrick-on-a-clear-conception-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Woessner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Organization/Business News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court of appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hendrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stem cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Woessner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patents4life.com/2009/07/university-of-pittsburgh-v-hedrick-on-a-clear-conception-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From a prosecutor&#8217;s standpoint, the &#8217;231 patent (link at bottom of this post) has &#8220;dream claims&#8221; to a new class of stem cells. Claim 1 reads: An isolated adipose-derived stem cell that can differentiate into two or more of the group consisting of a bone cell, a cartilage cell, a nerve cell, or a muscle [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/07/university-of-pittsburgh-v-hedrick-on-a-clear-conception-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Search of University Patents</title>
		<link>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/04/in-search-of-university-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/04/in-search-of-university-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Woessner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology transfer tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Woessner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patents4life.com/2009/04/in-search-of-university-patents/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technology Transfer Tactics, in conjunction with FreePatentsOnline, has created a site (link below) which they state can allow the visitor to view all of a given university&#8217;s patents by just clicking on the name of the institution. However, while this is an interesting tool to get a snapshot of a university&#8217;s recent activity, it does [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/04/in-search-of-university-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

