<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Biotechnology Patent Law Blog &#124; Patents4Life by Warren Woessner &#187; Utility/How-To-Use</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patents4life.com/category/utilityhow-to-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patents4life.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:44:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://www.patents4life.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Neutrokine-α litigation – On a different record from that before the EPO Appeal Board, the UK Court of Appeal finds different facts with a different result</title>
		<link>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/02/neutrokine-%ce%b1-litigation-%e2%80%93-on-a-different-record-from-that-before-the-epo-appeal-board-the-uk-court-of-appeal-finds-different-facts-with-a-different-result/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/02/neutrokine-%ce%b1-litigation-%e2%80%93-on-a-different-record-from-that-before-the-epo-appeal-board-the-uk-court-of-appeal-finds-different-facts-with-a-different-result/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Woessner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Utility/How-To-Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutrokine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Cole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Woessner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patents4life.com/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Paul Cole of Lucas &#38; Cole On February 9th the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 33; Jacob L.J.) held that Human Genome Sciences Patent EP-B-0939804 for Neutrokine-α did not meet the industrial applicability requirement of a.52(1) EPC and should be revoked for the United Kingdom. In reaching its decision the Court affirmed a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patents4life.com/2010/02/neutrokine-%ce%b1-litigation-%e2%80%93-on-a-different-record-from-that-before-the-epo-appeal-board-the-uk-court-of-appeal-finds-different-facts-with-a-different-result/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guessing Right Is Not Sufficient &#8212; The Ghost Of Rasmusson Walks Among Us!</title>
		<link>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/09/guessing-right-is-not-sufficient-the-ghost-of-rasmusson-walks-among-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/09/guessing-right-is-not-sufficient-the-ghost-of-rasmusson-walks-among-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Warren Woessner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Utility/How-To-Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janssen Pharmaceutica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmussen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Woessner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patents4life.com/2009/09/guessing-right-is-not-sufficient-the-ghost-of-rasmusson-walks-among-us/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rasmussen v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 413 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (link below) was a truly scary decision that many of us practitioners hoped would be ignored by future Fed. Cir. panels as an aberration brought on by over-extensive prosecution, a litigation setting, and good lawyering. In that decision a Merck application filed early in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patents4life.com/2009/09/guessing-right-is-not-sufficient-the-ghost-of-rasmusson-walks-among-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

