Recevie Email Updates
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
Tag Archives: Eli Lilly
On April 1st, Lilly filed an amicus brief in favor of Sequenom’s petition for cert. seeking to reverse Ariosa, that caused a lot of buzz in the IP community. (A copy is available at the end of this post.) To … Continue reading
Following its reversal of the Fed. Cir.’s decision in Mayo v. Prometheus (“Mayo”), the Supreme Court GVR’d in response to AMP’s (read: ACLU’s) appeal of Myriad’s claims to isolated DNA sequences and to a method of screening potential anti-cancer drugs … Continue reading
By Paul Cole, European Patent Attorney, Lucas & Co – Warlingham, UK Judgement – Human Genome Sciences Inc (Appellant) v Eli Lilly and Company (Respondent) The above proceedings relate to European Patent (UK) 0,939,804 concerning a new human protein called Neutrokine-α. … Continue reading
Novelty and Obviousness In An Empirical Research Field – The Decision of the UK Court of Appeal in Dr Reddy’s Laboratories v Eli Lilly
From Paul Cole The Lilly patent for olanzapine has been litigated in many jurisdictions including the US, Canada, the Czech Republic, Finland, Levitra order online Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, China and Hungary. In US Court of Appeals for the Federal … Continue reading