Tag Archives: inequitable conduct

American Calcar v. Amer. Honda Motor Co. – Therasense Goes Out For a Test Drive

On Friday, in American Calcar v. Amer. Honda Motor Co., App. No. 2013-1061 (Fed. Cir., September 26, 2014) a divided Fed. Cir. panel affirmed the district court’s ruling, following remand, that three patents on a multimedia system for vehicle information … Continue reading

Posted in Inequitable Conduct/Rule 56 | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

In re Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litigation – Making “Therasense” out of Confusion

Recently, a divided three judge panel sorting out a multi-party Hatch-Waxman suit, ruled that the patentee, Shinonogi, had not committed inequitable conduct in obtaining the patent that was subsequently reissued so as to obtain narrow claims focused on Rosuvastatin, or … Continue reading

Posted in Inequitable Conduct/Rule 56, Reissue | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Supplemental Examination Decision Tree – Lots of Dead Branches?

Well, I wish it were that simple, but I keep trying to conjure examples that would lead me to use supplemental examination to “purge inequitable conduct (IC)” that I discover after my patent issues, and which could provide the basis … Continue reading

Posted in AIA Patent Reform | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment