Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 
Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
-
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner
Pages
Archives
Author Archives: Warren Woessner
TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATION IN EUROPE – PATENTABLE SUBJECT MATTER?
By Paul Cole, Lucas & Co., UK The UK counterpart of In re Ngai is Bayer’s (Meyer’s) Application [1984] R.P.C. 11. In that case a claim to a package containing a known drug together with instructions for a new use … Continue reading
Posted in Non-U.S. Practice
Tagged Bayer's Application, business methods, EPO, intellectual property, patents, Paul Cole, UK, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment
"INFORMATION PLEASE!" – BILSKI TAKES IT TO THE SUPREMES
Reading the transcript of the oral arguments presented yesterday (a copy is attached at the end of this posting) as Bilski was presented to the Supreme Court, I was struck by how quickly certain Justices homed in on one of … Continue reading
Posted in Patenting Methods/Processes
Tagged Bilski, ip, Patent Law, Supreme Court, USPTO, Warren Woessner
2 Comments
OUTSIDE OPINIONS ARE STILL KEY TO AVOIDING WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT
By A. J. Nelson The October 29th IPO summary reports on the Senate version of the bill (attached below) regarding willful infringement: SENATE BILL CODIFIES SEAGATE STANDARD FOR WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT AND IMPOSES ADDITIONAL LIMITATIONS ON FINDING WILLFULNESS — Section 4 … Continue reading
Posted in Opinion Practice
Tagged FTO, IPO, Jim Nelson, Patent Law, patent opinions, patents, Seagate, Senate
Leave a comment
Who Owns First? Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems
Attached is an article written by Ron Schutz of Robins, Kaplan, Miller and Ciresi and is posted with his permission. APaTS Who Owns First.pdf
Posted in Assignment/Ownership
Tagged ciresi, Kaplan, miller, Patent Law, Robins, Schutz
Leave a comment