Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 
Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
-
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner
Pages
Archives
Category Archives: Non-U.S. Practice
Views of the EPO Enlarged Appeal Board in Treatment by surgery/MEDI-PHYSICS G 0001/07
Under what circumstances is injection a prohibited surgical method? Views of the EPO Enlarged Appeal Board in Treatment by surgery/MEDI-PHYSICS G 0001/07 . Opinion From Paul Cole The present proceedings resulted from a referral in decision T 0992/03 relating to EP-A-1066537. … Continue reading
Posted in Non-U.S. Practice
Tagged biotechnology law, EPO, intellectual property, Paul Cole, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment
Novelty and Obviousness In An Empirical Research Field – The Decision of the UK Court of Appeal in Dr Reddy’s Laboratories v Eli Lilly
From Paul Cole The Lilly patent for olanzapine has been litigated in many jurisdictions including the US, Canada, the Czech Republic, Finland, Levitra order online Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, China and Hungary. In US Court of Appeals for the Federal … Continue reading
Posted in Non-U.S. Practice
Tagged biotechnology law, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Eli Lilly, olanzapine, Paul Cole, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment
Court Decision in China Recognizes Novelty in Dosage Limitations in Swiss-Form Claims
Peksung Intellectual Property Ltd sent an interesting article (link below) reporting that the Higher People’s Court of Beijing held that both dosage form and dosage amount should be treated as limitations in Swiss-form claims. These “administration-related features” are often ignored … Continue reading
Posted in Non-U.S. Practice
Tagged china patent law, Patent Law, SIPO, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment
POST FROM AUSTRALIA – NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE PUBLICATIONS MAY NOT BE CITABLE ART.
By Bill Bennett, Pizzeys, Canberra, AU A unique aspect of Australian Patent Law is the requirement that a reference must be “reasonably ascertained, understood and regarded as relevant” by the hypothetical skilled person before it can be applied in an … Continue reading
Posted in Non-U.S. Practice
Tagged Australia, Bill Bennett, citable art, intellectual property, Patent Law, Pizzeys, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment