Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 
Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
-
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner
Pages
Archives
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Sigray, Inc. v. Carl Zeis X-Ray Microscopy, Inc.—When does “No” Projection Magnification Mean “No”?
In Sigray, Inc, v. Carl Zeis X-Ray [“Zeiss”], appeal 2023-2211 (Fed. Cir., May 23, 2025), the panel reviewed the Board’s decision in an IPR in which Claims 1-6 of Zeiss patent no. 7,400,704 were held not to be unpatentable over … Continue reading
Posted in Claim Interpretation, Inherency, Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Regents of the U. of Cal. v. Broad Inst. – “Just The Facts, Ma’am.”
The central theme in this interference decision involving U.S. Pat. No. 8,697,359 is the amount and type of evidence required to support the conception of an invention. Joe Friday wanted the witness to focus on the facts of the matter, … Continue reading
Allergan v. Sun – A Glidant Slips Past the Written Description Requirement
The most interesting part of this decision by the Fed. Cir. (No. 24- 1061, Aug. 13, 2024) is that the court was faced with an argument by Sun that Allergan’s claims in U.S. Pat. No.11,311,516 et al. are invalid as … Continue reading
From SLW International: Info on the Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court
Guest contribution from SLW International: A short paper with information on the Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court can be found here.