Tag Archives: Federal Circuit

Patents at the Supreme Court: Update and Fallout

Warren Woessner and Charles R. Macedo will speak on patentable subject matter post-Myriad, Prometheus and CLS in the upcoming AUTM Webinar on September 12.  Warren (Schwegman Lundberg) will present on the patentability of life sciences’ inventions such as diagnostics, drug … Continue reading

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter, Webinar | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hamilton Beach v. Sunbeam Products – “On Sale” Bar Clarified

On Wednesday August 14th, a divided  Fed. Cir. panel affirmed the invalidation of Hamilton Beach’s portable slow cooker under the “on-sale” or “in public use” bars of s. 102(b). Hamilton Beach Brands v. Sunbeam Prods., Inc., Appeal No. 2012-1581 (Fed. … Continue reading

Posted in 102 Patentability | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Submission of Copyrighted Articles to the PTO “Fair Use”, D. Minn. Magistrate Rules

Federal Magistrate Jeffrey Keyes ruled that it is fair use for law firms to use copyrighted journal articles when preparing patent applications, and recommended that an infringement suit against Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner PA (SLW) by two academic publishers be dismissed. … Continue reading

Posted in About SLW | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Evidentiary, My Dear Watson; Biosig, Instruments v. Nautilus, Inc.

This is a guest post from Ronald Schutz of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi. In Biosig, Instruments v. Nautilus, Inc., a unanimous panel of the Federal Circuit had little trouble deducing the definiteness of the patent at issue despite a … Continue reading

Posted in Claim Interpretation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment