Tag Archives: Patent Law

Get Your Application On The Fast Track – For A Price

On Friday, the PTO proposed changes in the rules to permit applicants for U.S. patents to receive “prioritized examination” (76 Fed. Reg. 6370 (Feb. 4 2011) – a copy is attached below). This program is a remnant of the three-track … Continue reading

Posted in USPTO Practice and Policy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Patent Reform Act Of 2011” – Reform Or Regression?

Starting from the premise that legislation can raise the quality of patents, Leahy/Hatch/Grassley are poised to introduce this year’s version of Patent Reform. The proposed reforms are extensive, and most have been debated at length. Although the Summary ends by … Continue reading

Posted in Patent Reform Legislation | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Astrazeneca v Apotex – Patent That Label!

I recently had a chance to re-read AstraZeneca LP v. Apotex, Inc., Appeal No. 2009-1381, 1424 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 1, 2010) and realized that it is a virtual case note on how to extend patent term by “patenting the label.” … Continue reading

Posted in Hatch-Waxman | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

In re Glatt Air Techniques – Glatt Sailing for Applicants

In re Glatt Air Techniques, Inc. (January 5, 2011) (link below), the Fed. Cir. in dicta reminded the PTO that evidence of commercial success – unlike a showing of unexpected results –need not be commensurate in scope with the claims … Continue reading

Posted in Obviousness | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment