Tag Archives: patents

Ariad: “The Future Ain’t What It Used To Be!” Judge Linn’s Concurrence and the Abuse and Neglect of the Enablement Requirement at the Federal Circuit

Posted on May 5, 2009 by Warren Woessner

In my post of April 13, 2009, I concluded with a brief summary of Judge Linn’s cogent concurrence, and noted that I would revisit it. Judge Linn does not believe that it was ever necessary for the court to graft … Continue reading →

Posted in Written Description Requirements (WDR) | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

In Search of University Patents

Posted on April 20, 2009 by Warren Woessner

Technology Transfer Tactics, in conjunction with FreePatentsOnline, has created a site (link below) which they state can allow the visitor to view all of a given university’s patents by just clicking on the name of the institution. However, while this … Continue reading →

Posted in Tech Transfer | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Federal Circuit Throws a Wrench into “Mechanism of Action” Claims

Posted on April 13, 2009 by Warren Woessner

A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently decided Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. v. Eli Lilly & Company, appeal no. 2008-1248 (Fed. Cir. April 3, 2009), involving Blatimore et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,410,516). … Continue reading →

Posted in Written Description Requirements (WDR) | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Kubin Analysis Continued

Posted on April 8, 2009 by Warren Woessner

My last post began a rather selective analysis of In re Kubin, which the Federal Circuit decided on April 3, 2009 (see previous post for citations to this and related decisions). Kubin’s claims to DNA molecules encoding sequences including that … Continue reading →

Posted in Obviousness | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment