Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 
Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
-
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner
Pages
Archives
Tag Archives: Supreme Court
Oral Argument in Mayo v. Prometheus – Why Mayo Will Lose
On December 7th at 10:05 a.m., the Supreme Court heard oral arguments (transcript at end of this post) in the “Prometheus case,” presented by Stephen M. Shapiro of Meyer Brown (Mayo) and Richard P. Bess of Latham & Watkins. Solicitor … Continue reading
HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES v. ELI LILLY – Increased European Harmony?
By Paul Cole, European Patent Attorney, Lucas & Co – Warlingham, UK Judgement – Human Genome Sciences Inc (Appellant) v Eli Lilly and Company (Respondent) The above proceedings relate to European Patent (UK) 0,939,804 concerning a new human protein called Neutrokine-α. … Continue reading
Posted in EP and UK Practice
Tagged court of appeals, Eli Lilly, EPO, Patent Law, Paul Cole, Supreme Court, Warren Woessner
1 Comment
Prometheus’s Brief – Don’t Confuse Us With “LabCorp”
It took me a while to get around to reading Prometheus’s brief to the Supreme Court in Mayo v. Prometheus Labs., No. 10-1150 (S. Ct. Oct. 31, 2011), because I was pretty sure how it would read and, in fact, … Continue reading
Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter
Tagged Bilski, LabCorp, Patent Law, Prometheus v. Mayo, Supreme Court, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment