Tag Archives: Supreme Court

Excerpts From Amicus Briefs Supporting Prometheus

Posted on November 11, 2011 by Warren Woessner

This intriguing compilation “Excerpts From 15 AMICI Briefs Supporting Respondent Prometheus: Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.,” was sent to me by Mark Corallo of Corallo Media Strategies, Inc., Alexandria, VA. UNH Law used to be Franklin Pierce Law … Continue reading →

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | Tagged amicus brief, biotechnology law, biotechnology news, intellectual property, ip, mark corallo, Mayo v Prometheus, Patent Law, patents, Supreme Court, Warren Woessner | Leave a comment

Part II – Mayo’s Brief Goes Back to A (Non-Precedential) Past

Posted on November 7, 2011 by Warren Woessner

In my last post on Mayo v. Prometheus, I noted that Mayo is cutting a trail of (legal) tears to ultimately rely on the reasoning underlying the “LabCorp dissent” (548 U.S. 132, 136). In this dissent from a dismissal of … Continue reading →

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | Tagged intellectual property, Mayo v Prometheus, Supreme Court, Warren Woessner | 1 Comment

Mayo’s Brief Goes Back To A (Non-Precedential) Future

Posted on November 3, 2011 by Warren Woessner

You all may be suffering from Prometheus v. Mayo fatigue by now, but this remains the most important IP case before the Supreme Court, and may well alter the course of life sciences patenting for the foreseeable future. I know … Continue reading →

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | Tagged Federal Circuit, intellectual property, ip, Prometheus v. Mayo, Supreme Court, Warren Woessner | 1 Comment

Infringement by Unobvious Changes – A Look (Way) Back

Posted on October 16, 2011 by Warren Woessner

As a much younger attorney, I gave a presentation at the 1990 AIPLA Annual Meeting: “A Review of Recent Federal Circuit Decisions Relating to Infringement” (AIPLA Selected Legal Papers, 9, 3 (July 1991)), in which I wrestled with the question … Continue reading →