Tag Archives: Warren Woessner

TALKING WRITTEN DESCRIPTION REQUIREMENT BLUES – ARIAD WOBBLES

On October 5, 2009, Ariad filed a 60 page brief (not counting attached appendices) with the Federal Circuit in support of its appeal in Ariad v. Lilly. (Attached below.) As you will recall from my post of August 24th, the … Continue reading

Posted in Written Description Requirements (WDR) | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Director Kappos Kills Prosecution Regulations Package

Two years of fear and loathing have ended, as the USPTO has announced that it is rescinding the “Continuations” and “Claims” rules that have been hanging over the heads of practitioners, and will move to dismiss/vacate the pending lawsuit over … Continue reading

Posted in USPTO Practice and Policy | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Hal Wegner Wakes Up ACI Biotech Patents Forum in Boston

On Sept. 30th, Harold C. (Hal) Wegner gave a talk on current developments that emphasized the importance of inter partes reexamination, particularly as a weapon of patent destruction. His opinion, summarized by me, is that KSR is increasingly being applied … Continue reading

Posted in Post-Grant Issues | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Guessing Right Is Not Sufficient — The Ghost Of Rasmusson Walks Among Us!

Rasmussen v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 413 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (link below) was a truly scary decision that many of us practitioners hoped would be ignored by future Fed. Cir. panels as an aberration brought on by over-extensive prosecution, … Continue reading

Posted in Utility/How-To-Use | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment