Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 
Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
-
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner
Pages
Archives
Tag Archives: Warren Woessner
Patentability Issues for Plants in the EPO
While this decision from the EPO Technical Board of Appeal raises more questions than it answers, it does a very good job of framing the issues and uncertainty regarding the patentability of plants in the EPO. The claim was to … Continue reading
Wyeth v. Abbott Labs. – Picking Plaintiff’s Poison
In July of 2011, I wrote a post for this blog on BSC v. J&J, a Fed. Cir. decision in which four J&J patents claiming stents eluting rapamycin, a drug that inhibits restenosis after balloon angioplasty, were held invalid for … Continue reading
Finally, A Reasonable Decision
This is a guest post from Greg Stark, attorney at Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner. Attached at the end of this post is an annotated copy of the June 21st decision from the Federal Circuit in Ultramercial v. Hulu. The underlying patent … Continue reading
Can AMP v. Myriad Revive Diagnostic Method Claims?
At the end of the Supreme Court’s Opinion, Justice Thomas makes it clear that the Court was impressed by Judge Byson’s dissents in the Fed. Cir. Myriad opinions. Although Judge Bryson was on the Intema panel that sank claims to … Continue reading
Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter
Tagged AMP v. Myriad, BRCA DNA, Federal Circuit, Patent Law, Supreme Court, Warren Woessner
4 Comments