Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 
Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
-
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner
Pages
Archives
Author Archives: Warren Woessner
Yeda Res. and Dev. v. Mylan – “We don’t need no Stinkin’ Prior Art”
The quote is from “Treasure of the Sierra Madre” when a bandido leader is trying to convince Bogart that his gang are Federales, and Bogie asks to see their badges. In the context of Yeda Res. and Dev. v. Mylan, … Continue reading
Posted in Prior Art
Tagged Federal Circuit, KSR, MPEP, Mylan, Obviousness, PTAB, Warren Woessner, Yeda
Leave a comment
The Abstract Idea Defense in a Patent Infringement Suit Jumped the Shark in Nike v Puma
Guest Post from Janal Kalis. Nike sued Puma for infringing its fly knit shoes. Puma filed a motion to dismiss because the patents asserted by Nike are directed to an abstract idea. As can be seen below, the Nike claims … Continue reading
Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter
Tagged fly knit shoes, janal Kalis, Nike, Patent Infringement Suit, Puma
1 Comment
New Annual Update: Critical Patent Validity Developments in 2017-2018
This is a guest post from the Chisum Patent Academy. The Academy is pleased to announce the September 2018 publication by Wolters Kluwer Law & Business of the annual Update for Volume I (Patentability and Validity) of the practitioner treatise, … Continue reading
Posted in Conferences and Classes
Tagged Annual Update, chisum patent academy, Don Chisum, Janice Mueller
Leave a comment
UCB, Inc. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc. – Can a Racemic Mixture be a “Lead Compound.”
UCB v. Accord, Appeal no. 2016-2610 et al. (Fed. Cir., May 23, 2018) may be headed to the Supreme Court, which prompted me to take another look at this opinion. This was a decision in Hatch-Waxman litigation, in which a … Continue reading
Posted in Obviousness
Tagged Federal Circuit, Hatch-Waxman, Judge Bryson, Judge Prost, Judge Stoll, Opinion, s. 103, Supreme Court, UCB v. Accord, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment