Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 
Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
-
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner
Pages
Archives
Author Archives: Warren Woessner
Gone Judge – Judge Randall Rader To Resign
Before stepping down as Chief Judge of the Fed. Cir. on May 30th, Judge Rader had sent a letter to his colleagues on the court apologizing for sending an email to an attorney who had appeared before the court a … Continue reading
Posted in Miscellaneous, People
Tagged biotechnology law, Federal Circuit, intellectual property, ip, IP law tools, Judge Rader, Patent Law, patents, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment
Consumer Watchdog v. Wis. Alumni Res. Foundation – Plaintiff Lacks Standing To Appeal Reexamination Loss
In Consumer Watchdog v. WARF, App. No. 2013-1377 (Fed. Cir., June 4, 2014) the Fed. Cir. found that the Watchdog can bark, but it can’t get a second bite. (A copy can be found at the end of this post.) … Continue reading
Nautilus v. Biosig – Solving Insoluble Ambiguity?
Today the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Fed. Cir.’s standard for resolving challenges to validity under s.112 para.2, based on whether or not a claim was “amenable to construction” and not “insolubly ambiguous”. Noting that Nautilus had urged that a patent … Continue reading
Posted in Section 112(2) - Indefiniteness
Tagged Biosig, Federal Circuit, Markman, Mayo v Prometheus, Nautilus, Supreme Court
1 Comment
K/S HIMPP v. Hear-Ware Technologies, LLC – Splitting a KSR Hair
In KSR, the Court seemed to encourage the broader use of the “logic, judgment, and common sense available to the person of ordinary skill that do not necessarily require explication in any reference” to resolve the obviousness question. 587 F.3d … Continue reading
Posted in Obviousness
Tagged Hear-Ware, HIMPP, judge dyk, Judge Lourie, KSR, Patent Law, reexamination, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment