Tag Archives: biotechnology law

Infringement by Unobvious Changes – A Look (Way) Back

Posted on October 16, 2011 by Warren Woessner

As a much younger attorney, I gave a presentation at the 1990 AIPLA Annual Meeting: “A Review of Recent Federal Circuit Decisions Relating to Infringement” (AIPLA Selected Legal Papers, 9, 3 (July 1991)), in which I wrestled with the question … Continue reading →

Posted in Doctrine of Equivalents, Infringement | Tagged AIPLA, biotechnology, biotechnology law, doctrine of equivalents, Federal Circuit, intellectual property, ip, IP law tools, Patent Law, patents, saint-gobain, Supreme Court, Warren Woessner | Leave a comment

Obviousness = Equivalence? Saint-Gobain v. Siemens

Posted on October 14, 2011 by Warren Woessner

Saint-Gobain Ceramics (“S-G”) has asked the Supreme Court to review the Fed. Cir. panel below, 647 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2011) in which the panel decision refused to reverse a district court decision that instructed the jury that it could … Continue reading →

Posted in Doctrine of Equivalents | Tagged biotechnology, biotechnology law, biotechnology news, doctrine of equivalents, DOE, Federal Circuit, intellectual property, ip, LSO crystals, Patent Law, patents, saint-gobain, siemens, Supreme Court, Warren Woessner | 1 Comment

Cordis v. BSC – Therasense at Work

Posted on October 3, 2011 by Warren Woessner

Last week the Fed. Cir. affirmed the district court’s finding of no inequitable conduct, due to the failure of the applicant or his attorney to cite a relevant prior art reference in a parent application that yielded the two patents-in-suit. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inequitable Conduct/Rule 56 | Tagged biotechnology law, bsc, cordis, Federal Circuit, intellectual property, ip, patent attorney, patent claims, Patent Law, Warren Woessner | Leave a comment

Myriad Petition For Rehearing Denied

Posted on September 14, 2011 by Warren Woessner

On September 13, 2011, the Fed. Cir. panel in AMP v. Myriad denied AMP’s (read ACLU’s) petition for rehearing by the panel. (A copy of the petition can be found at the end of this post.) In challenging the holding … Continue reading →