Tag Archives: intellectual property

Obviousness = Equivalence? Saint-Gobain v. Siemens

Saint-Gobain Ceramics (“S-G”) has asked the Supreme Court to review the Fed. Cir. panel below, 647 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2011) in which the panel decision refused to reverse a district court decision that instructed the jury that it could … Continue reading

Posted in Doctrine of Equivalents | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Cordis v. BSC – Therasense at Work

Last week the Fed. Cir. affirmed the district court’s finding of no inequitable conduct, due to the failure of the applicant or his attorney to cite a relevant prior art reference in a parent application that yielded the two patents-in-suit. … Continue reading

Posted in Inequitable Conduct/Rule 56 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Detroit PTO Gets Into Gear

From Gary Speier (SLW Shareholder) The AIA authorizes the USPTO Director to establish three satellite offices within three years, the first of which is to be located in Detroit, Michigan.  The USPTO website indicates that hiring of patent examiners and … Continue reading

Posted in AIA Patent Reform, Patent Reform Legislation | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

New Standard in Effect for Granting Inter Partes Reexaminations

USPTO ISSUING NEW RULES CONCERNING INTER PARTES REEXAMINATION — On September 16, after the President signed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act into law, the USPTO announced new rules governing the provisions of the Act relating to Inter Partes Reexamination that … Continue reading

Posted in USPTO Rules re 2AIA Patent Reform | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment