Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 
Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
-
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner
Pages
Archives
Tag Archives: USPTO
PTO Issues Interim Examination Instructions for Patentable Subject Matter and Invites Comments
On August 24, the PTO issued interim instructions (not rules) to guide Examiners post-Bilski. I did not see this as a major event, given that the Supreme Court will soon be reviewing the Bilski “machine or transformation” (M or T) … Continue reading
Posted in USPTO Practice and Policy
Tagged Bilski, Classen, intellectual property, USPTO, USPTO examiner, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment
David Kappos Confirmed as PTO Director
Just minutes ago, the US Senate confirmed David Kappos as the new Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office. On behalf of the leadership of AIPLA, I would like to … Continue reading
USPTO Customer Partnership Meeting Materials
The materials from the June 3, 2009 USPTO Customer Partnership Meeting are available online but I have downloaded them into a PDF format available here.USPTO Meeting Materials.pdf
Posted in USPTO Practice and Policy
Tagged Customer Partnership Meeting, patents, USPTO, Warren Woessner
Leave a comment
ABBOTT LABS. v. SANDOZ, INC. – ONE RULE FITS ALL?
Or “what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander”? Posts and pens have been busy reporting that the Federal Circuit, en banc, overruled Scripps v. Genentech, and ended the debate over whether a product-by-process claims should be construed … Continue reading