Author Archives: Warren Woessner

Supreme Court Decides Oil States – Inter Partes Review Does Not Violate Article III or the 7th Amendment

Posted on April 24, 2018 by Warren Woessner

The Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Oil States Energy Services v. Greene’s Energy Group, Appeal No. 16-712 (April 24, 2018), holding 7/2 that inter parties review was an appropriate exercise of the power of Congress to assign adjudication … Continue reading →

Posted in Inter Partes Review | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

USPTO Memorandum Seeks to Clarify “Inventive Concept” Requirement

Posted on April 20, 2018 by Warren Woessner

On April 19, 2018, the USPTO released a Memorandum from Robert Bahr, The Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy, to the Examiners,  that summarized the support required for a finding whether or not a claim directed to a judicial exception … Continue reading →

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | 1 Comment

Federal Circuit Circumvents Mayo/Alice Rule in Vanda v. West-Ward

Posted on April 17, 2018 by Warren Woessner

After Cleveland Clinic, IP practitioners were left to speculate about the fate of claims directed to methods of medical treatment. These claims seemed next in line for extinction by the Mayo/Alice rule, which I will paraphrase: “If a patent claim … Continue reading →

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

USPTO Director Outlines Challenges to the Patent System at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Patent Policy Conference

Posted on April 12, 2018 by Warren Woessner

The USPTO released a copy of the “Remarks” made by Director Andrei Iancu, that read like a major policy summary regarding challenges to the US patent system. Specific solutions were not suggested, but Iancu identified two areas that need review … Continue reading →

Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter | Leave a comment