Categories
Archives
Receive Email Updates
-
-
Certified Licensing Professionals, Inc., 2021 Disclaimer
This blog, Patents4Life, does not contain legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Its publication does not create an attorney-client relationship nor is it a solicitation for business. This is the personal blog of Warren Woessner and does not reflect the views of Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, or any of its attorneys or staff. To the best of his ability, the Author provides current and accurate information at the time of each post, however, readers should check for current information and accuracy.
- About Me
Warren D. Woessner Pages
Archives
Author Archives: Warren Woessner
Cleveland Clinic – Time to Purport an Inventive Concept in a Diagnostic Invention?
As an introduction to this topic, please reread my post of July 5, 2017 about The Cleveland Clinic v. True Health Diagnostics, subtitled “Time to Redefine ‘Inventive Concept’”? The claim were directed to diagnosing the presence of cardiovascular disease (CAD) … Continue reading
Posted in Patent Eligible Subject Matter
1 Comment
Do You Really Want to File for Pharma Patent Protection in Canada, India or Ecuador?
IPO Letter Reports Weaknesses in IP Protection Around the World In a 27 page letter dated February 8, 2018 and sent to Sue Chang at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the Executive Director of IPO, Mark Lauroesch, extensively … Continue reading
Posted in Govt Policy/PTO Policy, Int'l Practice and Policy, Non-U.S. Practice
Tagged Global IP, International IP, IPO
1 Comment
Chinese Team Reports Cloning Two Monkeys Using the Same Nuclear Donor – But Don’t Try to Patent Them!
On January 25, a team at the Chinese Academy of Sciences published an online paper that will appear in Cell, 172, 1-7 (Feb. 8, 2018) reported the cloning of two Macaque Monkeys by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer. While non-primate animals such … Continue reading
Aptalis Fails to “Surround’ Apotex’s Generic ER Tablet
Although non-precedential, Aptalis Pharmatech, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc., Appeal No. 2017-1344 (Fed. Cir., January 4, 2018) provides a useful outline of Phillips-type claim construction and requires a close reading to see why the infringement finding by the district court was … Continue reading
Posted in Claim Interpretation
Tagged apotex, Aptalis Pharmatech, Hatch-Waxman, Pharmaceutical law
Leave a comment